We'll start by exploring how version control can be used to keep track of what one person did and when. Even if you aren't collaborating with other people, version control is much better for that than this:
The first time we use Mercurial on a new machine, we need to configure a few things.
Dracula sets up his new Windows laptop by using his editor to create
a new file called %USERPROFILE%\Mercurial.ini
(that's spelled $USERPROFILE/Mercurial.ini
if you are in gitbash
)
containing the following
lines:
[ui]
username = Vlad Dracula <vlad@tran.sylvan.ia>
editor = nano
[extensions]
color =
[color]
mode = win32
Wolfman has both a Mac laptop and a Linux one and he uses his editor
to create a new file called ~/.hgrc
on both of those machines with
the same contents:
[ui]
username = Jack Wolfman <jack@cali.forn.ia>
editor = nano
[extensions]
color =
(Please use your own name and email address instead of Dracula's
or Wolfman's,
and make sure you choose an editor that's actually on your system,
such as notepad
on Windows.)
Those configuration file settings tell Mercurial:
The fact that these settings are in the Mercurial configuration file in our home directory means that they will be used for every project on this machine. This bit of setup only needs to be done once.
Once Mercurial is configured, we can start using it. Let's create a directory for our work:
$ mkdir planets
$ cd planets
and tell Mercurial to make it a repository—a place where Mercurial can store old versions of our files:
$ hg init
Mercurial commands are written hg verb
,
where verb
is what we actually want it to do.
If we use ls
to show the directory's contents,
it appears that nothing has changed:
$ ls
But if we add the -a
flag to show everything,
we can see that Mercurial has created a hidden directory called .hg
:
$ ls -a
. .. .hg
Mercurial stores information about the project in this special sub-directory. If we ever delete it, we will lose the project's history.
We can check that everything is set up correctly by asking Mercurial to verify the structure of our repository:
$ hg verify
checking changesets
checking manifests
crosschecking files in changesets and manifests
checking files
0 files, 0 changesets, 0 total revisions
Let's create a file called mars.txt
that contains some notes
about the Red Planet's suitability as a base.
(We'll use nano
to edit the file;
you can use whatever editor you like.
In particular, this does not have to be the editor that you set in your
Mercurial global configuration earlier.)
$ nano mars.txt
mars.txt
has now been created and it contains a single line:
$ ls
mars.txt
$ cat mars.txt
Cold and dry, but everything is my favorite color
We can ask Mercurial to tell us what it knows about the files in our project
with the hg status
command.
Mercurial tells us that it's noticed the new file:
$ hg status
? mars.txt
The ?
at the beginning of the line means that Mercurial isn't keeping
track of the file.
We can tell Mercurial that it should do so using hg add
:
$ hg add mars.txt
and then check that the right thing happened:
$ hg status
A mars.txt
Mercurial now knows that it's supposed to keep track of mars.txt
,
but it hasn't yet recorded any changes for posterity as a commit.
To get it to do that,
we need to run one more command:
$ hg commit -m "Starting to think about Mars"
When we run hg commit
,
Mercurial takes the file we have told it about by using hg add
and stores a copy permanently inside the special .hg
directory.
We use the -m
flag (for "message")
to record a comment that will help us remember later on what we did and why.
If we just run hg commit
without the -m
option,
Mercurial will launch nano
(or whatever other editor we configured at the start)
so that we can write a longer message.
If we run hg status
now:
$ hg status
we get no output because everything is up to date.
If we want to know what we've done recently,
we can ask Mercurial to show us the project's history using hg log
:
$ hg log
changeset: 0:72ab25fa99a1
tag: tip
user: Vlad Dracula <vlad@tran.sylvan.ia>
date: Mon Apr 14 14:41:58 2014 -0400
summary: Starting to think about Mars
hg log
lists all changes committed to a repository
in reverse chronological order.
The listing for each changeset includes:
0
and 72ab25fa99a1
in this case,
but your identifier will likely be different),The revision number is a convenient integer shorthand for the hexidecimal identifier.
Where Are My Changes?
If we run
ls
at this point, we will still see just one file calledmars.txt
. That's because Mercurial saves information about files' history in the special.hg
directory mentioned earlier so that our filesystem doesn't become cluttered (and so that we can't accidentally edit or delete an old version).
Now suppose Dracula adds more information to the file.
(Again, we'll edit with nano
and then cat
the file to show its contents;
you may use a different editor, and don't need to cat
.)
$ nano mars.txt
$ cat mars.txt
Cold and dry, but everything is my favorite color
The two moons may be a problem for Wolfman
When we run hg status
now,
it tells us that a file it already knows about has been modified:
$ hg status
M mars.txt
The M
at the beginning of the line means that Mercurial has noticed that
we have modified the mars.txt
file.
We can double-check our work using hg diff
,
which shows us the differences between
the current state of the file
and the most recently committed version:
$ hg diff
diff -r 72ab25fa99a1 mars.txt
--- a/mars.txt Mon Apr 14 14:41:58 2014 -0400
+++ b/mars.txt Mon Apr 14 15:48:53 2014 -0400
@@ -1,1 +1,2 @@
Cold and dry, but everything is my favorite color
+The two moons may be a problem for Wolfman
The output is cryptic because
it is actually a series of commands for tools like editors and patch
telling them how to reconstruct one file given the other.
If we can break it down into pieces:
diff
command
to compare the last committed and new versions of the file.+
markers in the first column show where we are adding lines.Let's commit our change:
$ hg commit -m "Concerns about Mars's moons on my furry friend"
Checking our project's status:
$ hg status
we get no output because all of the changes have been committed.
We can see our commits with hg log
:
$ hg log
changeset: 1:9b3b65e50b8c
tag: tip
user: Vlad Dracula <vlad@tran.sylvan.ia>
date: Mon Apr 14 15:52:43 2014 -0400
summary: Concerns about Mars's moons on my furry friend
changeset: 0:72ab25fa99a1
user: Vlad Dracula <vlad@tran.sylvan.ia>
date: Mon Apr 14 14:41:58 2014 -0400
summary: Starting to think about Mars
Of course sometimes we may not want to commit everything at once.
For example,
suppose we're adding a few citations to our supervisor's work
to our thesis.
We might want to commit those additions,
and the corresponding addition to the bibliography,
but not commit the work we're doing on the conclusions
(which we haven't finished yet).
To handle that,
simply do two
(or more)
separate commits,
listing the names of the files to be included in each commit in the hg commit
command:
$ hg commit -m "Cite Frankenstein(2010) and Frankenstein, etal(2011)." methods.txt biblio.txt
...
<later>
...
$ hg commit conclusions.txt -m "Update conclusions re: sunlight."
Notice that the list of file names can come before or after the commit comment
in the hg commit
command.
Let's add another line to the file for practice and to make our revision history more interesting:
$ nano mars.txt
$ cat mars.txt
Cold and dry, but everything is my favorite color
The two moons may be a problem for Wolfman
But the Mummy will appreciate the lack of humidity
$ hg diff
diff -r 9b3b65e50b8c mars.txt
--- a/mars.txt Mon Apr 14 15:52:43 2014 -0400
+++ b/mars.txt Mon Apr 14 16:33:57 2014 -0400
@@ -1,2 +1,3 @@
Cold and dry, but everything is my favorite color
The two moons may be a problem for Wolfman
+But the Mummy will appreciate the lack of humidity
So far, so good:
we've added one line to the end of the file
(shown with a +
in the first column).
Now, let's commit our changes:
$ hg commit mars.txt -m "Thoughts about the climate"
and look at the history of what we've done so far:
$ hg log
changeset: 2:43da31fb96ec
tag: tip
user: Vlad Dracula <vlad@tran.sylvan.ia>
date: Mon Apr 14 16:37:12 2014 -0400
summary: Thoughts about the climate
changeset: 1:9b3b65e50b8c
user: Vlad Dracula <vlad@tran.sylvan.ia>
date: Mon Apr 14 15:52:43 2014 -0400
summary: Concerns about Mars's moons on my furry friend
changeset: 0:72ab25fa99a1
user: Vlad Dracula <vlad@tran.sylvan.ia>
date: Mon Apr 14 14:41:58 2014 -0400
summary: Starting to think about Mars
If we want to see what we changed when,
we use hg diff
again,
but refer to old versions
using the --rev
or -r
flag and the revision numbers:
$ hg diff --rev 1:2 mars.txt
diff -r 9b3b65e50b8c mars.txt
--- a/mars.txt Mon Apr 14 15:52:43 2014 -0400
+++ b/mars.txt Mon Apr 14 16:44:06 2014 -0400
@@ -1,2 +1,3 @@
Cold and dry, but everything is my favorite color
The two moons may be a problem for Wolfman
+But the Mummy will appreciate the lack of humidity
$ hg diff -r 0:2 mars.txt
diff -r 72ab25fa99a1 -r 43da31fb96ec mars.txt
--- a/mars.txt Mon Apr 14 14:41:58 2014 -0400
+++ b/mars.txt Mon Apr 14 16:37:12 2014 -0400
@@ -1,1 +1,3 @@
Cold and dry, but everything is my favorite color
+The two moons may be a problem for Wolfman
+But the Mummy will appreciate the lack of humidity
In this way, we build up a chain of revisions. The most recent end of the chain is the changeset with the highest revision number.
To see what changes were made between a particular changeset and its parent
use the --change
or -c
flag:
hg diff --change 1
diff -r 72ab25fa99a1 -r 9b3b65e50b8c mars.txt
--- a/mars.txt Mon Apr 14 14:41:58 2014 -0400
+++ b/mars.txt Mon Apr 14 15:52:43 2014 -0400
@@ -1,1 +1,2 @@
Cold and dry, but everything is my favorite color
+The two moons may be a problem for Wolfman
All right: we can save changes to files and see what we've changed—how can we restore older versions of things? Let's suppose we accidentally overwrite our file:
$ nano mars.txt
$ cat mars.txt
We will need to manufacture our own oxygen
hg status
now tells us that the file has been changed,
but those changes haven't been committed:
$ hg status
M mars.txt
We can put things back the way they were
by using hg revert
:
$ hg revert mars.txt
$ cat mars.txt
Cold and dry, but everything is my favorite color
The two moons may be a problem for Wolfman
But the Mummy will appreciate the lack of humidity
As you might guess from its name,
hg revert
reverts to (i.e., restores) an old version of a file.
In this case,
we're telling Mercurial that we want to recover the last committed version
of the file.
If we want to go back even further,
we can use the --rev
or -r
flag and a revision number instead:
$ hg revert --rev 0 mars.txt
Mercurial really doesn't want to cause us to lose our work,
so it defaults to making a backup when we use hg revert
:
$ hg status
? mars.txt.orig
The mars.txt.orig
file is a copy of mars.txt
as it stood before the hg revert
command.
It's not tracked by Mercurial.
It's just there in case we made a mistake and really didn't want to revert,
or in case there's some content from before the revert that we decide that we really do want to copy into mars.txt
.
When we're sure that we don't need *.orig
files we can just go ahead and delete them.
If we really don't want Mercurial to create *.orig
files when we use hg revert
,
we can use the --no-backup
option, its short version -C
or add
[alias]
revert = revert --no-backup
to your ~/.hgrc
(or%USERPROFILE%\Mercurial.ini
if you are using Windows).
The fact that files can be reverted one by one tends to change the way people organize their work. If everything is in one large document, it's hard (but not impossible) to undo changes to the introduction without also undoing changes made later to the conclusion. If the introduction and conclusion are stored in separate files, on the other hand, moving backward and forward in time becomes much easier.
What if we have files that we do not want Mercurial to track for us, like backup files created by our editor or intermediate files created during data analysis? Let's create a few dummy files:
$ mkdir results
$ touch a.dat b.dat c.dat results/a.out results/b.out
and see what Mercurial says:
$ hg status
? a.dat
? b.dat
? c.dat
? results/a.out
? results/b.out
Putting these files under version control would be a waste of disk space. What's worse, having them all listed could distract us from changes that actually matter, so let's tell Mercurial to ignore them.
We do this by creating a file in the root directory of our project called .hgignore
.
$ nano .hgignore
$ cat .hgignore
syntax: glob
*.dat
results/
The syntax: glob
line at the top of the file tells Mercurial that
we want to use the same kind of pattern matching that we use in the shell
(which is known as "globbing" and the patterns as "globs").
The second line tells Mercurial to ignore any file whose name ends in .dat
and the third one to ignore everything in the results
directory.
(If any of these files were already being tracked,
Mercurial would continue to track them.)
Once we have created this file,
the output of hg status
is much cleaner:
$ hg status
? .hgignore
The only thing Mercurial notices now is the newly-created .hgignore
file.
You might think we wouldn't want to track it,
but everyone we're sharing our repository with will probably want to ignore
the same things that we're ignoring.
Let's add and commit .hgignore
:
$ hg add .hgignore
$ hg commit -m "Add the ignore file"
$ hg status
We can also always see the status of ignored files if we want:
$ hg status --ignored
I a.dat
I b.dat
I c.dat
I results/a.out
I results/b.out
~/.hgrc
(or %USERPROFILE%\Mercurial.ini
on Windows) to configure a user name,
email address, editor, and other preferences once per machine.hg init
initializes a repository.hg status
shows the status of a repository.hg add
tells Mercurial to track files.hg commit
creates a snapshot of the changes to 1 or more files in the local repository.hg diff
displays differences between revisions.hg revert
recovers old versions of files..hgignore
file tells Mercurial what files to ignore.bio
.
Write a three-line biography for yourself in a file called me.txt
,
commit your changes,
then modify one line and add a fourth and display the differences
between its updated state and its original state.